Re: [Geopriv] [geopriv] rfc3825bis #39 (new): AD review

From: Thomson, Martin ^lt;Martin.Thomson@andrew.com>
Date: Sun Oct 31 2010 - 18:39:42 EDT

On 2010-10-31 at 08:35:57, geopriv issue tracker wrote:
> Conversion to PIDF-LO does not increase uncertainty; conversion
> from
> PIDF-LO to version 1 increases uncertainty by less than a factor of
> 2
> in each dimension. Since it is not possible to translate an
> arbitrary PIDF-LO to version 0 with a bounded increase in
> uncertainty, the conversion to version 0 is not specified. Note
> also
> that in the conversion of version 0 to PIDF-LO it may not always be
> possible to produce a PIDF-LO that captures both the location as
> well
> as the uncertainty region surrounding it.

WFM. In retrospect, the last sentence doesn't make a lot of sense. It could be safely removed.

--Martin

_______________________________________________
Geopriv mailing list
Geopriv@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/geopriv
Received on Mon, 1 Nov 2010 06:39:42 +0800

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Sun Oct 31 2010 - 18:40:08 EDT