Re: [Geopriv] RE: [Ecrit] LoST Progress

Hi James,

I think we shouldn't get too focused on where the work takes place.
After all, we have a very good relationship with GEOPRIV and if we
finally conclude that it would be better todo parts of the work in
GEOPRIV than that will be fine as well.

Still, the problem surfaced in ECRIT as part of the location hiding for
emergency calls. That's what we care about. There may be other use cases
for non-emergency services but so far we wanted to solve an emergency
services problem. Right?

Ciao
Hannes

Winterbottom, James wrote:
> Please can somebody explain to me how location hiding is an ECRIT
> charter item?
>
> I understand that IF, it changes LoST that it may have SOME necessary
> ECRIT work, but the core of everything to do with location hiding is on
> the access side, with how an end-point gets this stuff. This is, without
> any doubt in my mind a geopriv concern, as it is location information of
> sorts.
>
> I am totally opposed to any charter change with in ECRIT to pick up work
> that has clear scope in a different WG.
>
> Cheers
> James
>
>
>
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Marc Linsner [mailto:mlinsner@cisco.com]
>> Sent: Friday, 15 June 2007 11:36 PM
>> To: 'ECRIT'
>> Subject: [Ecrit] LoST Progress
>>
>> The ECRIT WG chairs have struggled with the progress we made on the
>> discussions in context of the different proposals for providing
>>
> 'location
>
>> hiding'.
>>
>> First, we started our discussion on the requirements quite late in the
>> process, LoST has already been through one working group last call.
>>
>> Second, there is still confusion about the requirements and the
>> architecture
>> surrounding 'location hiding'.
>>
>> We believe the requirements/solutions surrounding 'location hiding'
>>
> need
>
>> further discussion. Hence, in the interest of moving forward and
>>
> meeting
>
>> our
>> stated (already late) milestone, we are going to ask the authors to
>>
> submit
>
>> LoST-06 with changes that came from the last call process.
>>
>> It would be great to complete the document as initially planned since
>>
> it
>
>> is
>> already delayed. We do expect to see more discussions in the context
>>
> of
>
>> 'location hiding'. We will work on a proposal for a charter update to
>> reflect this work and potentially other related activities.
>>
>> We hope everyone will support this path forward.
>>
>> Marc & Hannes
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Ecrit mailing list
>> Ecrit@ietf.org
>> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ecrit
>>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> This message is for the designated recipient only and may
> contain privileged, proprietary, or otherwise private information.
> If you have received it in error, please notify the sender
> immediately and delete the original. Any unauthorized use of
> this email is prohibited.
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> [mf2]
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Geopriv mailing list
> Geopriv@ietf.org
> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/geopriv
>

_______________________________________________
Geopriv mailing list
Geopriv@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/geopriv
Received on Sat, 16 Jun 2007 10:30:27 +0200