On Mar 15, 2007, at 1:33 PM, Brian Rosen wrote:
> While a formal liaison relationship with NENA is possible, I don't
> feel we
> need one. NENA, like IETF, can do formal liaisons, but the
> organization is
> not an SDO, and doesn't really have a great process for liaisons.
> It would
> be nice to have a better way to get document drafts to IETF folks.
Brian,
The IETF has liaison relationships with organizations that are not
typically classified as SDOs. ICANN is a big example. I would also
disagree about NENA not being an SDO, as they appear to be publishing
standards in the context of these conversations. The standards may
not be typical technical wire protocol specifications, but
requirements can also be standards. I just had a conversation with
Roger Hixson about the possibility of a formal liaison, and he
believes it to be appropriate.
-andy
_______________________________________________
Geopriv mailing list
Geopriv@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/geopriv
Received on Thu, 15 Mar 2007 15:30:59 -0400
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Thu Mar 15 2007 - 15:29:57 EDT