[Geopriv] RE: [Ecrit] Location information in emergency sessioninitiation, need for time and accuracy?

So you are saying that the examples in the appendix of RFC-3825 are
wrong, and that RFC-3825 cannot and never will describe an area?

It didn't die in Geopriv, I was waiting for you to actual come back with
an explanation, what you did was write back an email that was totally
irrelevant to the discussion. So I am still waiting!

> -----Original Message-----
> From: John Schnizlein [mailto:jschnizl@cisco.com]
> Sent: Sunday, 10 September 2006 10:49 AM
> To: Winterbottom, James
> Cc: geopriv@ietf.org; Marc Linsner; ecrit@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [Ecrit] Location information in emergency
sessioninitiation,
> need for time and accuracy?
>
> What part of "geographic location of the client" is unclear to you?
>
> It is beyond comprehension how this could be interpreted as a area
> rather than a point, with the resolution of the measurement of that
> point explicitly included in the location information.
>
> Why is this old argument being rehashed in the ecrit WG when if
finally
> seemed to die (mercifully) in GeoPriv?
>
> On Sep 9, 2006, at 6:11 PM, Winterbottom, James wrote:
>
> > So I am going to ask you. Point, or area?

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This message is for the designated recipient only and may
contain privileged, proprietary, or otherwise private information.
If you have received it in error, please notify the sender
immediately and delete the original. Any unauthorized use of
this email is prohibited.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[mf2]

_______________________________________________
Geopriv mailing list
Geopriv@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/geopriv
Received on Sat, 9 Sep 2006 20:02:18 -0500