Marc,
Perhaps the statement should have been, is not suitable for any
application that require a deterministic degree of accuracy, something
to that effect.
I am quite sure that in some circumstances that the encoding scheme is
fine, but I wouldn't want to be my life on it in an emergency, would
you?
James
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Marc Linsner [mailto:mlinsner@cisco.com]
> Sent: Saturday, 9 September 2006 8:02 AM
> To: Winterbottom, James
> Cc: ecrit@ietf.org; geopriv@ietf.org
> Subject: RE: [Ecrit] Location information in emergency
> sessioninitiation,need for time and accuracy?
>
> James,
>
> >
> > So, either it is a point, in which case the resolution for
> > the most part should be ignored and a Biz to RFC-3825 is
> > required to say this. Or, it is an area which is described by
> > the resolution bits, in which case you need to find a way to
> > eliminate the problems described or accept that it should not
> > be used in emergency applications.
>
> Please explain why emergency applications are different from other
> applications that describe fixed locations using the geo coordinate
> system.
>
>
> -Marc-
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This message is for the designated recipient only and may
contain privileged, proprietary, or otherwise private information.
If you have received it in error, please notify the sender
immediately and delete the original. Any unauthorized use of
this email is prohibited.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[mf2]
_______________________________________________
Geopriv mailing list
Geopriv@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/geopriv
Received on Fri, 8 Sep 2006 17:11:05 -0500
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Fri Sep 08 2006 - 18:27:17 EDT