[Geopriv] Question about status of Civic location information in PIDF-LO

This may have been discussed/resolved in Minneapolis, but I was not able to
attend, so I apologize in advance if I am traversing ground already covered.

The definition of the civil (a.k.a. civic) location information provided in
the DHCP download of location information to the UA, described in I-D
draft-ietf-geopriv-dhcp-civil-05.txt, includes explicit tags for several
elements that are not included in the I-D (soon to be RFC) for PIDF-LO.
Specifically, tagged fields for Building, Unit, Room, Placetype are missing
from the latest draft I have.

Are there plans to fold these into the definition of the Civic location
information in PIDF-LO in the RFC? In the next version of the PIDF-LO?

Thanks,
Nadine Abbott

_______________________________________________
Geopriv mailing list
Geopriv@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/geopriv
Received on Wed, 16 Mar 2005 08:31:30 -0500