Paul Kyzivat wrote:
>
> Yes, I think that something of that sort may be needed, or at least
> desirable. (glob style anyway.)
So far, prefix (for user names) and postfix (for hosts) seems to be
working for the examples (which is also similar to the SQL "LIKE %"
facility).
>
> Something else that hasn't been touched upon is watchers whose identity
> is a tel uri. I think we have to expect that there will be such. Its
> ugly, but I think there will be need for special matching on various
> parts of these.
I don't see tel:12*15*7
as all that useful.
> Yes, these are significant issues. Are you going to keep two different
> sets of business cards and make a decision about which one to give to
> someone? (The plain white ones, and the "platinum" ones.)
I suspect this is more useful for the address you put on your web page
("is my shop open?") vs. your business card.
> I haven't got a particular mechanism in mind. But I agree there is some
> similarity between saying "I calling but I just want your voicemail
> server", and saying "I want whatever presence I can get without going
> into pending and requesting approval".
I wonder if the caller preferences mechanism couldn't be extended to
handle this type of mechanism pretty easily.
>
> The point was that phone numbers are somewhat scarce. You probably often
> won't be willing to have one for your buddies and another for everybody
> else. And then there will just be one on your business card.
_______________________________________________
Geopriv mailing list
Geopriv@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/geopriv
Received on Mon, 28 Feb 2005 20:28:59 -0500
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Mon Feb 28 2005 - 20:46:44 EST