RE: [Geopriv] Working Group Last Call for draft-ietf-geopriv-pres -01

Allison, Andy, Randy, and all,
Do I understand correctly that there may/will be a second phase of work
to possibly include additional components in a future version of the
PIDF-LO?
The North American NENA organization has been working to identify
location-related information that is needed/desired by Public Safety in
North America,
but we are not yet at a point that we can make concrete proposals.
We do not wish to slow down the efforts of the geopriv WG in moving forward
with the existing PIDF-LO,
but we are expecting/hoping that there will be some flexibility to consider
additional information in the future (and if not in PIDF-LO, then
elsewhere)?
Please confirm or correct my assumptions?
Thanks,
Nadine Abbott

-----Original Message-----
From: geopriv-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:geopriv-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf
Of Andrew Newton
Sent: Tuesday, July 27, 2004 8:24 PM
To: geopriv@ietf.org
Cc: Allison Mankin; 'Randall Gellens'
Subject: [Geopriv] Working Group Last Call for draft-ietf-geopriv-pres-01

All,

This is the start of a two-week GEOPRIV working group last call for "A
Presence Architecture for the Distribution of Geopriv Location Objects"
(http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-geopriv-pres-01.txt).

The period is two weeks. Please send your comments no later than
11-August-2004.

Allison, Andy and Randy

_______________________________________________
Geopriv mailing list
Geopriv@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/geopriv

_______________________________________________
Geopriv mailing list
Geopriv@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/geopriv
Received on Wed, 28 Jul 2004 07:59:31 -0400