[Geopriv] RE: question on Carrying Location Objects in RADIUS i-d

Hi David,
WLAN access network could be owned by a GSM, CDMA, or a WISP operator.
Having prefixes (as defined in the draft) enable the ownership to be
expressed in different formats in the attribute.
BR,
Farid

> -----Original Message-----
> From: David Mariblanca (ML/EEM)
> [mailto:david.mariblanca@ericsson.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, July 27, 2004 6:33 AM
> To: Adrangi, Farid
> Cc: Tschofenig Hannes; Avi Lior; geopriv@ietf.org
> Subject: RE: question on Carrying Location Objects in RADIUS i-d
>
>
>
> Thanks Farid,
> is this attribute will carry the WLAN operator name, I don't
> see why the prefix "GSM" is allowed. If the server, within
> this attribute, expects a WLAN operator name, then the prefix
> is not needed, is it ? But my concern was about the VPLMN ID,
> which it seems it will be in the RADIUS extensions draft
> (currently in 01). I wil check then in the next version.
>
> Regards,
> David.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Adrangi, Farid [mailto:farid.adrangi@intel.com]
> Sent: martes, 27 de julio de 2004 15:15
> To: David Mariblanca (ML/EEM)
> Cc: Tschofenig Hannes; Avi Lior; geopriv@ietf.org
> Subject: RE: question on Carrying Location Objects in RADIUS i-d
>
>
> Hi David,
> The operator-Name attribute is intended to carry the operator
> name owning the WLAN access network. We intend to add an
> attribute for PLMN ID (or specifically speaking, VPLMN ID) in
> the lan attribute extension draft discussed in RADEXT WG.
> Hope this helps. Please let me know if you have any
> questions. BR, Farid
>
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: David Mariblanca (ML/EEM)
> > [mailto:david.mariblanca@ericsson.com]
> > Sent: Friday, July
> > 23, 2004 11:28 AM
> > To: Tschofenig Hannes; 'geopriv@ietf.org'
> > Subject: question on Carrying Location Objects in RADIUS i-d
> >
> >
> > Hi Hannes,
> > In the paper draft-tschofenig-geopriv-radius-lo-00.txt, I was
> > looking for an
> > attribute suitable for carrying the PLMN id from one network
> > to other. I
> > believe that's the purpose of Operator-Name attribute, but
> > then I find in
> > the description:
> >
> > "The GSM prefix can be used to indicate operator names based
> > on GSMA TADIG
> > codes. "
> >
> > Currently GSM operators use the E.164 numbering plan to
> > identify networks
> > and E.212 to identify users internally. Shouldn't these
> > numbering plans be
> > allowed ?
> >
> > Regards,
> > David.
> >
>

_______________________________________________
Geopriv mailing list
Geopriv@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/geopriv
Received on Tue, 27 Jul 2004 10:29:34 -0700