RE: [Geopriv] WGLC for draft-ietf-geopriv-pidf-lo-01.txt

James,
Will these comments address the definitions of "Method" and "Source" for
inclusion in the location object? I'm not sure how the discussion of these
additional data elements concluded.
Thanks,
Nadine

-----Original Message-----
From: geopriv-admin@ietf.org
To: Peterson, Jon
Cc: geopriv@ietf.org
Sent: 3/17/2004 10:57 AM
Subject: Re: [Geopriv] WGLC for draft-ietf-geopriv-pidf-lo-01.txt

Jon

Just to let you know (on this list) that I'm finalizing my (2) comments
with appropriate text offerings for review. I should have this done this

evening and I'll post to the list sometime thereabouts.

At 11:23 PM 3/3/2004 -0800, Allison Mankin wrote:

>Geopriv-ites,
>
>This is the start of a three-week WG Last Call for the Geopriv
>Location Object Format, draft-ietf-geopriv-pidf-lo-01.txt.
>Its target status is Proposed Standard.
>
>The period is three weeks to allow for the IETF travel and
>reporting out from this meeting.
>
>Send your comments by March 26.
>
>Allison, Andy and Randy
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>Geopriv mailing list
>Geopriv@ietf.org
>https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/geopriv

cheers,
James

                                *******************
                 Truth is not to be argued... it is to be presented

_______________________________________________
Geopriv mailing list
Geopriv@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/geopriv

_______________________________________________
Geopriv mailing list
Geopriv@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/geopriv
Received on Fri, 19 Mar 2004 16:08:56 -0500