re: The IESG: [Geopriv] Protocol Action: 'Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol Option for Coordinate-based Location Configuration Information' to Proposed Standard

Allison (and all)

I have no issue with the global change of GeoLoc to GeoConf.

Thank you for your support of this effort!

At 01:49 PM 12/22/2003 -0800, Allison Mankin wrote:
>James, John, Marc, and all,
>
>A small diff to the draft that came up for IESG response but got lost
>in the shuffle, to make sure it was absolutely clear that this was a
>configuration-related object and not a location information object,
>was to rename the DHCP Option GeoConf instead of GeoLoc. This change
>is supported by the AD, Ted Hardie, and the other chairs, and is very
>minor. It entails only three edits (below). This note is just to
>let folks know so that there's no surprise, and development/documentation
>can be adjusted early enough.
>
>Allison
>
>Old:
> Where critical decisions might be based on the value of this
> GeoLoc option, DHCP authentication in [4] SHOULD be used to
> protect the integrity of the DHCP options.
>
>New:
> Where critical decisions might be based on the value of this
> GeoConf option, DHCP authentication in [4] SHOULD be used to
> protect the integrity of the DHCP options.
>
>
>Old:
> IANA has assigned a DHCP option code of TBD for the GeoLoc option
>
>New:
> IANA has assigned a DHCP option code of TBD for the GeoConf option
>
>
>Old:
> The GeoLoc Option defines two fields for which IANA is to maintain
> a registry
>
>New:
> The GeoConf Option defines two fields for which IANA is to maintain
> a registry
>
>_______________________________________________
>Geopriv mailing list
>Geopriv@ietf.org
>https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/geopriv

cheers,
James

                                *******************
                 Truth is not to be argued... it is to be presented

_______________________________________________
Geopriv mailing list
Geopriv@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/geopriv
Received on Mon Dec 22 17:58:49 2003