Re: A remark on the location-object-issues-00 draft

From: Carl Reed ^lt;creediii@mindspring.com>
Date: Wed Jun 26 2002 - 15:43:07 EDT

Just as a point of reference, the LIF and the OpenGIS Consortium (OGC) are
working closely together to insure a basic level of consistency in how
geometry and coordinate reference systems are expressed and communicated in
our respective specifications. This includes common use of terms/definitions
and XML tags.

Regards

Carl Reed
OGC
----- Original Message -----
From: Cuellar Jorge <Jorge.R.Cuellar@mchp.siemens.de>
To: <geopriv@mail.apps.ietf.org>
Sent: Wednesday, June 26, 2002 12:10 AM
Subject: A remark on the location-object-issues-00 draft

>
> In Section 4.2 there is a short list of groups that may have
> defined certain formats for location information. Although
> the list is not meant to be all-inclusive, and it is just a
> suggestion, the problem is that in appearance favors one
> wireless specification group (3GPP) over another (3GPP2),
> and implicitly one wireless technology (GSM) over another
> (CDMA). That wasn't the intent. The sentence should be
> supplemented by inclusion of 3GPP2. (Any further suggestion
> for this list, as well as any comment to the draft is also
> welcome.)
>
> Regards,
>
> Jorge
>
> --------------------------------------------
> Dr. Jorge R Cuellar T +49 89 636-47 585
> Security
> CT IC 3
> Siemens jorge.cuellar@mchp.siemens.de
> ----------------------------------------------
Received on Wed Jun 26 15:52:22 2002

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Thu Jan 22 2004 - 12:32:23 EST