Well, since its -02 incantation it appears to have grown a syntax ("semantics")
section anyone familiar with e.164 syntax would appreciate, but not much else
of note.
2. Coordinate Systems
... WGS 84 ...
I've a preference for UTC96. Tastes vary.
3. Implementation
... "geo.region" is used for the country subdivision code from ISO 3166-2
Nope. Can't use iso3166.
7. Applicability
...
... They may not be used to describe a non-localised,
moving, or intangible object such as a multinational company, river,
aircraft or mathematical theory.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
I'm relieved by that last bit.
8. Security Considerations
This draft raises no security issues.
This draft raises no significant privacy issues ...
I don't agree.
9. Internationalization consideration
... should use US-ASCII or UTF-8.
Nope. Not with that either.
IANA considerations (none).
I looked at Andrew's work two years ago and didn't find it interesting.
> ... but for my
> purposes here the specifics aren't important, only the intended use.
Some I-Ds are used to float (temporarily) some marketing ploy or another.
Personally I think the specifics are the only thing important in any I-D.
Cheers,
Eric
Received on Tue May 21 21:48:47 2002
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Thu Jan 22 2004 - 12:32:23 EST