At 06:59 PM 5/17/2002 -0700, Aleksandar Gogic wrote:
>At 08:44 PM 5/16/2002 -0400, Richard Shockey wrote:
>>At 05:00 PM 5/16/2002 -0500, James M. Polk wrote:
>>>Richard
>>
>>
>>First let me thank you for a very thoughtful answer ..this is exactly the
>>kind of proper technical discussion I've been hoping to see here.
>>
>>
>>>I share many of your views written here. I would add a few requirements
>>>such as altitude, velocity and vector (better than direction).
>
>"Vector" may be a slight improvement, but perhaps more appropriate terms
>would be those used in aviation (navigation), such as "Heading" (relative
>to True North). Along the same lines ... "horizontal velocity" and
>"vertical velocity".
These 3 terms are quite acceptable to me in this context.
*************************************
"People generally demand more respect for their own rights than they are
willing to allow for others"
James M. Polk
Senior Consulting Engineer
Office of the CTO
Cisco Systems
2200 East President George Bush Turnpike
Richardson, TX 75082 USA
w) 972.813.5208
f) 972.813.5280
www.cisco.com
Received on Tue May 21 20:29:34 2002
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Thu Jan 22 2004 - 12:32:23 EST