RE: Geopriv WG - meeting 5-6 Jun, other news

Dear Allison,
I applaud the effort to revive discussions in this group. I think there are
several interesting areas this group can cover. One quick comments on the
revised milestones: In order to keep within the scope of working with
existing location technologies, may I suggest that if an example draft is
planned to be published, even for informational purposes only, as alluded
in Jan 03 timeframe, then is should cover all existing location technology
instead of just handset-based. For user-controlled location, a similar
argument can be made for network-based solutions as well. I will be more
than happy to contribute an example draft for network-based location
solution. I look forward to participating in the discussion .

Thanks
Daniel Ashitey
Trueposition Inc.
King of Prussia, PA

-----Original Message-----
From: Allison Mankin [mailto:mankin@isi.edu]
Sent: Monday, May 13, 2002 11:04 AM
To: ietf-geopriv@mail.apps.ietf.org
Cc: mankin@isi.edu; ned.freed@mrochek.com; rg+ietf@qualcomm.com
Subject: Geopriv WG - meeting 5-6 Jun, other news

With our Area Director's consent, we have just advanced all of
our milestones (and the charter page is updated). We have also
confirmed his permission for us to have an interim meeting,
as well as the Yokohama meeting, to try to catch up.

The interim will be at Qualcomm, in San Diego, Jun 5-6. Qualcomm
has confirmed hosting. I don't have room and hotel info from
Randy or John N. yet, but we will get it to you, as well as looking
into providing a phone bridge.

The basis of our discussions for now should be the requirements draft
that Jorge Cuellar has recently announced, which represents joined efforts
from several of the folks who wrote before, and which has had
several different groups commenting and discussing it off the list
to date.

Allison
Received on Tue May 14 00:42:19 2002