At 05:36 PM 4/4/2002 -0800, Randall Gellens wrote:
>At 5:01 PM -0500 4/3/02, Brian Rosen wrote:
>
>>I'd love to actually start working on that stuff
>
>We're required by our charter to do the requirements first.
Yes ...but is there rough consensus on the basics ..this is a object not a
protocol and there are two distinct aspects ..one the expression of
geospatial location and second a expression of policy (privacy) about the
use of that object?
If that is the rough consensus then we can begin to list the attributes
each data object should be able to express, with examples, and how the two
are linked as the basis of the requirements document.
As for security aspects .. is this application usage specific or some form
of general admonition.
BTW I posted earlier today in response to Brian at around 11 AM .. did it
come through?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Richard Shockey, Senior Manager, Strategic Technology Initiatives
NeuStar Inc.
45980 Center Oak Plaza Bldg 8 Sterling, VA 20166
1120 Vermont Ave NW Suite 400 Washington DC 20005
Voice +1 571.434.5651 Cell : +1 314.503.0640, Fax: +1 815.333.1237
<mailto: rshockey@ix.netcom.com> or
<mailto: rich.shockey@neustar.biz>
<http://www.neustar.biz>
<http://www.enum.org>
<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<
Received on Thu Apr 4 21:49:46 2002
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Thu Jan 22 2004 - 12:32:23 EST