At 09:50 AM 4/3/2002 -0500, Adam Shostack wrote:
>On Wed, Apr 03, 2002 at 08:27:56AM -0500, Rosen, Brian wrote:
>> >
>> One of the "users", probably the first user, of the geopriv object
>> is emergency calls in SIP.
>
>Perhaps this is a mistake? I think that emergency calling is complex,
>and I'm far more concerned about my non-emergency privacy.
Are you suggesting we now are looking at two solutions (because you just broke
the problem up into two problems)?
>
>I'm also interested in trying, and would like to throw out the
>suggestion that we might specify a level of crypto which is secure,
>and offer nothing on slower processors.
Now, how is a single protocol (which GEOPRIV is chartered to create) going to
tell the power *and* load of each processor before determining that crypto is
or isn't required? Or am I misreading your comment?
>Adam
*************************************
"People generally demand more respect for their own rights than they are
willing to allow for others"
James M. Polk
Consulting Engineer
Office of the CTO
Cisco Systems
2200 East President George Bush Turnpike
Richardson, TX 75082 USA
w) 972.813.5208
f) 972.813.5280
www.cisco.com
Received on Wed Apr 3 15:14:48 2002
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Thu Jan 22 2004 - 12:32:23 EST