Re: No Minneapolis Meeting

Wait a minute at IETF it is not the members who convene the meetings and
make the agenda, it is the IETF, WG chairs who do this.

Next I have a question to Andrew, do you wish your draft
draft-zmolek-enum to be considered at geopriv?

Regards,

Zmolek, Andrew (Andrew) wrote:

>With iptel cancelled, I agree that we should re-use the slot as planned. See you there!
>
>--Andy
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Cuellar Jorge [mailto:Jorge.R.Cuellar@mchp.siemens.de]
>Sent: Thursday, March 14, 2002 2:34 PM
>To: 'John Morris'
>Cc: geopriv@mail.apps.ietf.org
>Subject: RE: No Minneapolis Meeting
>
>
>I agree with John, we should meet next week. And I
>agree with the agenda that John proposes.
>
>Perhaps the easiest, is to meet Tuesday 1415-1515 in
>Salon D, as it was planned. Note that IPTel was also cancelled
>(Andy Zmolek had a conflict here).
>
>At 10:55 AM -0500 3/8/02, John Morris wrote:
>
>><snip>
>>If I were setting the agenda, I would make it simple (at least
>>simple in form, but not in substance):
>>
>> 1. Discussion of the scope of charter and WG
>> 2. "Final" (pending posting and discussion back on the list,
>>of course) discussion of definitions and terminology
>> 3. Set concrete plan to (a) finish on terminology, if
>>needed, (b) create a scenarios document, if there is WG consensus to
>>create one, and (c) create a requirements document.
>><snip>
>>In any event, we should try to get together next week. John
>>
>
>See you there! Best regards, Jorge
>

-- 
Behcet