RE: No Minneapolis Meeting

At 3:45 PM -0800 3/11/02, Randall Gellens wrote:
>At 8:15 PM +0100 3/6/02, Cuellar Jorge wrote:
>
>>Randall, is your decision not to have a meeting at IETF-53
>>definitive??
>
>If we were to meet, what would the agenda be? What would we hope to
>accomplish?
>
>I'm in favor of concrete steps to make forward progress. I'd like
>to avoid wasting people's time.

My proposed agenda was somewhat buried at the end of a prior e-mail......

At 10:55 AM -0500 3/8/02, John Morris wrote:
><snip>
>If I were setting the agenda, I would make it simple (at least
>simple in form, but not in substance):
>
> 1. Discussion of the scope of charter and WG
> 2. "Final" (pending posting and discussion back on the list,
>of course) discussion of definitions and terminology
> 3. Set concrete plan to (a) finish on terminology, if
>needed, (b) create a scenarios document, if there is WG consensus to
>create one, and (c) create a requirements document.
>
><snip>

In any event, we should try to get together next week. John
Received on Wed Mar 13 16:24:10 2002