Re: bar bof scheduling [was RE: No Minneapolis Meeting]

From: James M. Polk ^lt;jmpolk@cisco.com>
Date: Wed Mar 06 2002 - 12:53:23 EST

At 12:00 PM 3/6/2002 -0500, John Morris wrote:
>At 8:45 AM -0700 3/6/02, Zmolek, Andrew (Andrew) wrote:
><snip>
>>I'm 100% in support of a BoF. Given that iptel
>>was meeting at the same time as geopriv, may I suggest we try to
>>organize a meeting during the next group of sessions, Tuesday afternoon
>>1545-1645. What do you think?
>
>That one's not good for me (I need to go to cdi). I'd nominate
>1300-1500 on Monday.

This time conflicts with pana

<snip>
>
>John
>
>----------------------------------------
>John B. Morris, Jr.
>Director, Internet Standards, Technology
> & Policy Project
>Center for Democracy and Technology
>1634 I Street NW, Suite 1100
>Washington, DC 20006
>(202) 637-9800
>(202) 637-0968 fax
>jmorris@cdt.org
>http://www.cdt.org
>----------------------------------------

*************************************
"People generally demand more respect for their own rights than they are
willing to allow for others"

James M. Polk
Consulting Engineer
Office of the CTO

Cisco Systems
2200 East President George Bush Turnpike
Richardson, TX 75082 USA
w) 972.813.5208
f) 972.813.5280
www.cisco.com
Received on Wed Mar 6 12:55:31 2002

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Thu Jan 22 2004 - 12:32:22 EST