Hello John,
I agree with your comments. Are the descriptive locations to be
defined in this WG? I wonder if you have any pointers on the descriptive
location representation. My second question is what is the position of
this WG on MLP? Are we going to adopt it?
John W Noerenberg II wrote:
> At 12:53 PM -0700 12/12/01, John W Noerenberg II wrote:
>
>> At 10:32 AM +0900 12/3/01, Kenji Takahashi wrote:
>>
>>> Just an FYI. LIF has published the mobile location protocol
>>> specification.
>>
>>
>> Thanks, Kenji. I'll have a look.
>
>
> I haven't read them in detail, however, the protocol uses only
> geometric coordinates for location. It provides for a couple of
> different systems. In fact, it goes into impressive depth about
> them. However, descriptive locations are not addressed.
>
Regards,
-- BehcetReceived on Wed Dec 19 12:49:20 2001
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Thu Jan 22 2004 - 12:32:22 EST