RE: Requirements Document

> Hmmm, I'm sorry if I'm being dense.

> Do I interpret correctly what you are saying is that:
> 1. The primary goal is to define an object meeting the privacy
> and security requirements for a broad range of uses, of
> which emergency services is but one example
> 2. Binding such an object to HTTP is secondary, and intended to
> be (usefully) illustrative of how the object should be used

This is correct, more or less.

> I have no intention of trying to go outside this group
> to solve the emergency call problem. What I want to do is
> make sure the object as defined is useful in that environment,
> and similar environments.

And you do this by making sure the requirements allow for the
emergency call case in addition to the other cases we must cover.

                                Ned
Received on Thu Aug 30 10:19:51 2001