Re: Requirements Document

Hello,
  This is in line with what Allison said during the meeting. I think that the
others (Haitao, James, Mari, Kenji, etc.) should follow suite.
  During the meeting Henning talked about the urgency of this WG's business but
I could not catch his reasons. Why?

"Rosen, Brian" wrote:

> I am very sorry I was not able to be in the meeting, it conflicted
> with the Megaco meeting, which I needed to attend. I was asked to
> republish the draft requirements document from the Spatial effort.
> I have done so, and you can find it at:
> http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-rosen-geopriv-requirements-00.txt
>
> Please note that I did a very quick edit to substitute geopriv
> for Spatial and "object" for protocol, but did not do any
> further editing. As a result, it would be easy to criticize
> this draft as not in compliance with the charter in several
> areas. However, I would think it would be a very good start.
> I will volunteer to author/edit the geopriv requirements document
> if that is acceptable.
>
> Brian

Regards,

--
Behcet