From: "Mari Korkea-aho" <mari.korkea-aho@nic.fi>
X-Mailer: TWIG 2.6.0.cvs
X-Client-IP: 193.65.100.112
Reply-To: mari.korkea-aho@iki.fi
Hi,
I have been following this list for a while - It is nice to see that there is
such an interest towards location privacy issues. Here are some opinions
of mine.
The location privacy or privacy issues in general are challenging. This can
also be determined by the conversation on this email-list. If we want to
provide location privacy/security we need to understand very well the
domain we provide it for. I agree with Kenj Takahashi who stated some
while ago that the privacy and security models are depending on type of
location-based service and different usage scenarios. If one wants to start
to work on location privacy issue, we need to specify for what case we
want to solve it.
Principally I see two general cases:
- the location information is provided in conjunction with a service
request, or
- the location is obtained from somewhere.
If one would like to start working on this issue, I would start working on
the second case and try make as simple and generic model as possible for
obtaining the location information from such an instance (I think this was
also suggested by Christian Hauser).
For me the issue of location information data representation format is
completely separate from the privacy/secyrity issue. It is just some data
transferred in some message by some protocol.
So far there has been a lot of talk on this list, but not much real activity
in the WG yet. What are the plans for getting the WG work running?
Regards,
Mari
________________________________________________________________
Ilmainen Internet @ http://www.nic.fi/
Received on Mon Jul 30 10:55:47 2001
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Thu Jan 22 2004 - 12:32:22 EST